The status of an entity as an “instrumentality” of a state or local governmental unit is relevant for the following purposes:
- I.R.C. 141: Private activity bonds test (see Treas. Reg. 1.141-1(b) definition of “governmental person”);
- I.R.C. 170: Deductions for contributions and gifts to or for the use of a state, a possession or any political subdivision of the foregoing (see I.R.C. 170(c)(1)) or an instrumentality of a state or an instrumentality of a political subdivision of a state if the contributions are made for exclusively public purposes (see Rev. Rul. 75-359);
- I.R.C. 3121(b)(7) and 3306(c)(7): Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA) taxes on the wages paid by an employer to employees with respect to employment.
Revenue Ruling 57-128 sets forth the following factors to be taken into account in determining whether an entity is an instrumentality of one or more governments:
- Whether the organization is used for a governmental purpose and performs a governmental function;
- Whether the performance of the organization’s functions is on behalf of one or more states or political subdivisions;
- Whether there are private interests involved, or whether the states or political subdivisions involved have the powers and interests of an owner;
- Whether control or supervision of the organization is vested in public authority or authorities;
- Whether express or implied statutory or other authority is necessary or exists for the creation and/or use of the organization; and
- The organization’s degree of financial autonomy and the source of its operating expenses.
The status of an entity as an instrumentality does not automatically mean that the entity is also an on-behalf-of issuer (Click link to view topic) for purposes of I.R.C. 103(c)(1). On-behalf-of issuer status is tested based on “constituted authority” status under Rev. Rul. 57-187 or on-behalf-of status under Rev. Proc. 63-20. There are some PLRs in which the entity at issue is both an instrumentality (usually for purposes of proving that the entity is a governmental purpose of the private activity bond test) and an on-behalf-of issuer.
Rulings and Resources:
GCM 36088: Whether a contribution for exclusively public purposes to a wholly-owned instrumentality of a state or of a political subdivision is a contribution “to’ rather than merely “for the use of’ such state or political subdivision for the purposes of I.R.C. 170(c)(1) and, therefore, is subject to the 50 percent limitation on deductions for contributions by individuals under I.R.C 170(b)(1)(A).
Rev. Rul. 75-359: Deductions for contributions and gifts.
GCM 36781: Whether the entity is conducting a governmental function.
GCM 39683: Whether the bar association is performing a governmental function.
PLR 200026013: Concerns the status of the Authority as an instrumentality for purposes of I.R.C. 141 private activity bond tests, applying Rev. Rul. 57-128. Authority is a membership corporation. Members are all political subdivisions. Persons serving on the board are required to be officers or employees of the members. Each member has the power to remove (with or without cause) any of the directors that it appointed. A removed director’s successor is appointed by the member that removed the director to serve the unexpired term. The entity’s purpose is to coordinate the operation of electric generation resources. The entity receives funding from its members. The entity submits financial reports to its members. No net earnings of the Authority may be paid or inure to the benefit of any private person. Upon dissolution, any assets remaining after the entity satisfies its obligations are distributed ratably to its members.
PLR 200225010: The issue addressed in this ruling is whether an Authority, which is a joint venture between tribes, is an “instrumentality” (within the meaning of Rev. Rul. 57-128) of its governmental/tribal members and therefore a “governmental person” for purposes of the private activity bond tests.
PLR 200510016: Whether (1) the Association’s income is exempt from taxation under I.R.C. 115, (2) the Association is an instrumentality for purposes of I.R.C. 3121(b)(7) and 3306(c)(7), under Rev. Rul. 57-128 and (3) the contributions made to the Association are deductible by the donors as charitable contributions under I.R.C. 170(c)(1). Association was created by City for the purpose of carrying out the promotion of tourism for the City. By promoting tourism in the City, the Association will contribute to the economic development of the City through increased tourism and visitation to the City and will increase the expenditure of tourist dollars at local businesses.
PLR 200524015: That (1) Agency and Agency’s Subsidiary are instrumentalities under Rev. Rul. 57-128 for purposes of the private activity bond tests, (2) income of Agency and Agency’s Subsidiary is excludable from gross income under I.R.C. 115(l) and (3) Agency’s use of bond proceeds will not constitute use meeting either the private business tests of I.R.C. 141(b) or the private loan tests of I.R.C. 141(c). Agency was formed by governmental entities to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes, of its members with a view towards maximizing the efficient acquisition, management and delivery of natural gas supplies and reducing operating costs of its members. (Keyword: Piggybacking Instrumentality.)
PLR 200718002: A System is an instrumentality of the County under Rev. Rul. 57-128 for purposes of the private activity bond rules of I.R.C. 141 (i.e., the bond-financed facility is therefore used by a governmental person and not a private business user) as well as an on-behalf-of issuer (constituted authority under Rev. Rul. 57-187) of the County for purposes of issuing tax-exempt bonds (i.e., the System could issue tax-exempt bonds on behalf of the County). County Board created System as a public corporation that will operate as a subsidiary of County to provide health care and related services to the general public and related education and research programs. System is required to provide services to persons who are indigent.
PLR 200736022: [To come]
PLR 200836005: Issues include (1) whether the entity’s income is exempt from taxation under I.R.C. 115, (2) whether the entity qualifies as an instrumentality for purposes of making charitable contributions to the entity under I.R.C. 170(c)(1) and (3) whether interest on bonds issued by the entity are excludible from gross income because the entity is a constituted authority under Rev. Rul. 57-187.
PLR 201220005, February 3, 2012: Public corporation established to support state’s schools for the vision and hearing impaired qualifies as an “instrumentality of the state” contributions to which are deductible under I.R.C. 170(c)(1).
PLR 201308010 (Nov. 20, 2012): The Internal Revenue Service applies the six factors in Rev. Rul. 57-128 to economic development corporations created by City. Ruling relates to determining whether services provided to the corporations are “employment” under FICA.
PLR 201411018 (Aug. 9, 2013): The Internal Revenue Service applies the six factors in Rev. Rul. 57-128 to a state university or community college and concludes that the university/college is an instrumentality of the state for purposes of I.R.C. 141 private activity bond tests and is eligible to receive charitable contributions under I.R.C. 170(c)(1) (“A state, a possession of the United States, or any political subdivision of any of the foregoing, or the United States or the District of Columbia, but only if the contribution or gift is made for exclusively public purposes”).